In my mind, the night after every episode involves David and Gary sitting in the shed out back, drinking beers and talking everything through. Sadly, they're not putting that in the actual show. But Mikey North did an interview the other day about what he'd like to see in Gary's future, and he said he'd love his feud with David Platt to flare up again, and for it to be an on-running thing like Ken Barlow and Mike Baldwin. I'd prefer love and companionship and destroying their enemies' lives together to a feud, but I'll take a feud if there's nothing else on offer.
I do actually know where the Steve-Tracy-Becky storyline is going, but I won't spoil it for you. I think the injunction thing was just a bit of weird writing though, the kind they've had to do quite a lot to write Tracy back into the show and keep her in it. Steve did say something at the end about how they had a binding agreement, and she said 'Sue me!', but if it's still true I can't see why he wouldn't just do that, and have Amy immediately back with him. Anyway. I'm less annoyed about weird writing that means she leaves than weird writing that brought her back, in any case.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-30 03:26 pm (UTC)I do actually know where the Steve-Tracy-Becky storyline is going, but I won't spoil it for you. I think the injunction thing was just a bit of weird writing though, the kind they've had to do quite a lot to write Tracy back into the show and keep her in it. Steve did say something at the end about how they had a binding agreement, and she said 'Sue me!', but if it's still true I can't see why he wouldn't just do that, and have Amy immediately back with him. Anyway. I'm less annoyed about weird writing that means she leaves than weird writing that brought her back, in any case.